| Home
| WLR Daily | Publications
| Mooting | Search
| Prices | About
ICLR |
| ICRE Menu: |

|
MATERNITY LEAVE Hoyland v Asda Stores Ltd EAT(Sc): Bean J, Mr J M Keenan and Dr W M Spiers: 22 February 2005 The claimant's employers operated a scheme whereby an annual bonus was paid to employees based on the sales achieved by the workforce as a whole and the bonus paid to an employee absent for eight consecutive weeks or more was reduced pro rata. In 2002 the claimant went on maternity leave and was absent for 183 days in the year including 18 weeks of ordinary maternity leave. The bonus paid to her was reduced to reflect that absence, and she complained to an employment tribunal that, inter alia, she had been discriminated against on the ground of her sex, contrary to sections 1(1) and 6(2) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975. The tribunal held that the bonus was a payment regulated by contract and as such excluded from complaint under the 1975 Act by section 6(6); but that the claimant had suffered a detriment within the meaning of section 47C of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of the employers' failure to pay her a bonus for the two-week period of compulsory maternity leave, though the tribunal rejected her claim in so far as it related to other maternity leave as being "wages or salary" excluded under regulation 9 of the Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999. The claimant appealed. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held: The appeal was dismissed. Appearances: Brian Napier QC (Equal Opportunities Commission) for the claimant; John Hand QC and Paul Gilroy (Solicitor, Asda Stores Ltd) for the employers. |
Subscribe to The Industrial Cases reports now for full text reports. |